<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisiting the virtual courtyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845</link>
	<description>Bob Rehak&#039;s Blog about Special Effects, Videogames, Film, and Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Rehak</title>
		<link>http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845&#038;cpage=1#comment-382696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Rehak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845#comment-382696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, thanks for your comments; I&#039;m glad my post added a little coolness to the video for you. How fun that you bring up &lt;em&gt;Dead Men Don&#039;t Wear Plaid&lt;/em&gt; -- I remember watching it as a kid (hmm, it was released in 1982, making me [and you too, I assume?] 15 or 16 at the time) and being more interested in Rachel Ward&#039;s figure than in Martin&#039;s clever pastiche. But you&#039;re right, that movie prefigured &quot;classier&quot; raidings of the past  like &lt;em&gt;Zelig&lt;/em&gt; (1983) and &lt;em&gt;Forrest Gump&lt;/em&gt; (1994) -- the latter trumpeted as a digital-effects film but following a similar impulse to mix and match its temporalities. Of course, those two weren&#039;t as invested in a specifically &lt;strong&gt;cinematic&lt;/strong&gt; history as was &lt;em&gt;Dead Men&lt;/em&gt;. Along those lines, did you see &lt;em&gt;Hugo&lt;/em&gt;? I&#039;m about to write a capsule review of it ...

BTW, Mulvey&#039;s full piece on the clumsy sublime (still only a single page) can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/university-of-california-press/a-clumsy-sublime-vub4kysdM5&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for your comments; I&#8217;m glad my post added a little coolness to the video for you. How fun that you bring up <em>Dead Men Don&#8217;t Wear Plaid</em> &#8212; I remember watching it as a kid (hmm, it was released in 1982, making me [and you too, I assume?] 15 or 16 at the time) and being more interested in Rachel Ward&#8217;s figure than in Martin&#8217;s clever pastiche. But you&#8217;re right, that movie prefigured &#8220;classier&#8221; raidings of the past  like <em>Zelig</em> (1983) and <em>Forrest Gump</em> (1994) &#8212; the latter trumpeted as a digital-effects film but following a similar impulse to mix and match its temporalities. Of course, those two weren&#8217;t as invested in a specifically <strong>cinematic</strong> history as was <em>Dead Men</em>. Along those lines, did you see <em>Hugo</em>? I&#8217;m about to write a capsule review of it &#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, Mulvey&#8217;s full piece on the clumsy sublime (still only a single page) can be found <a href="http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/university-of-california-press/a-clumsy-sublime-vub4kysdM5" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hathaway</title>
		<link>http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845&#038;cpage=1#comment-382636</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hathaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845#comment-382636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the digital revisiting, that brought to mind Steve Martin&#039;s &#039;Dead Men Don&#039;t Wear Plaid&#039;. I&#039;m not sure just how, but seems like the underlying schtick of that movie is a similar exploration/enjoyment/ode to classical Hollywood, though perhaps in a more general way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the digital revisiting, that brought to mind Steve Martin&#8217;s &#8216;Dead Men Don&#8217;t Wear Plaid&#8217;. I&#8217;m not sure just how, but seems like the underlying schtick of that movie is a similar exploration/enjoyment/ode to classical Hollywood, though perhaps in a more general way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hathaway</title>
		<link>http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845&#038;cpage=1#comment-382634</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hathaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphic-engine.swarthmore.edu/?p=1845#comment-382634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the &#039;advent calendar&#039; bit--and the idea of &#039;clumsy sublime&#039; (new to me). Great to look at this video in a thoughtful way. I saw it a few days ago and didn&#039;t think much of it, but reading this adds a lot to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the &#8216;advent calendar&#8217; bit&#8211;and the idea of &#8216;clumsy sublime&#8217; (new to me). Great to look at this video in a thoughtful way. I saw it a few days ago and didn&#8217;t think much of it, but reading this adds a lot to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
